What BEWT Is Proposing

Written By D S

Before any community can evaluate a proposal, it must first understand exactly what is being proposed — not how it is framed, not how it is marketed, not how it is emotionally described.

The Bangerz Education & Wellbeing Trust (BEWT) is not proposing:

  • a programme

  • a support service

  • an academic partnership

  • or a sports pathway addition

They are proposing a structural conversion of Kelston Boys’ High School into a privately governed sports-focused charter model aligned with Auckland Sports College.

This is not a supplement.
This is a redefinition.

1. Governance Conversion: From Public to Private Control

Currently, Kelston Boys’ High School is governed by:

  • a Board of Trustees

  • elected by parents and whānau

  • accountable to community voice

  • under the Education and Training Act (2020)

BEWT is proposing:

  • to remove democratic governance

  • to replace the Board with a private trust

  • where decision-making authority no longer belongs to the community

  • and where education direction is determined internally, not publicly

This process is called:

Devolution of governance authority.

Once governance shifts:

  • Whānau consultation becomes optional, not required

  • Community influence becomes advisory, not structural

  • Institutional accountability shifts from public to private

This is not an improvement of the existing school.
It is the replacement of its governance model.

Reference:
Education and Training Act (2020), Sections 121–150 — school board governance and democratic accountability.

2. Identity Conversion: From Community School → Sports Performance Academy

The BEWT proposal mirrors the existing Auckland Sports College identity framework, where:

  • Rugby league

  • Athletic performance development

  • Sports conditioning culture

are positioned as core organising functions of schooling.

The language used across BEWT and ASC websites repeatedly emphasises:

  • “discipline culture”

  • “high-performance mindset”

  • “forceful and aggressive athlete” (under the word “Banger”)

  • “conditioning”

  • “competitive identity”

This is not the language of education.
It is the language of performance training institutions.

Education research is clear:
Schools that centre performance identity over academic identity limit long-term outcomes for students (Golann, 2021; Parker et al., 2013).

3. Curriculum Consequences: Reduced Academic Pathways and Limited UE Access

A school’s ability to prepare students for:

  • university entrance

  • higher learning

  • skilled trades

  • long-term career mobility

depends on Level 3 academic subjects with specialist teachers.

However, in the Auckland Sports College model:

A school cannot deliver University Entrance without:

  • three Level 3 academic subjects (NZQA requirement)

  • UE Literacy

  • specialist teacher capacity

Meaning:

The majority of Kelston students under this conversion would not be able to enter university, even if they wanted to.

This is not speculation.
It is structural math.

4. Cultural Identity: Performance vs Belonging

Kelston’s strength has always been:

  • belonging

  • cultural identity

  • brotherhood

  • respect

  • collective uplift

This proposal replaces that with:

  • performance identity

  • external evaluation

  • competitiveness as self-worth

Research on Māori and Pacific educational success is clear:

Identity belonging predicts long-term academic and personal outcomes.
(Anae, 2010; Airini et al., 2011)

Performance identity does not.

5. Summary of What Is Being Proposed

This is not a proposal designed to expand opportunities.

This is a proposal designed to redefine who Kelston boys are allowed to become.

Reference List (Public Sources)

D S
Previous

A Reading of the BEWT Proposal Documents
Next

Kelston Boys’ High School: A Brief Context